October 20, 2017

SSC Index

I've posted this as an index of the posts made on Slate Star Codex before Naval Gazing moved here. Posts marked with an asterisk have been revised and a full replacement posted here.

Series Intro*

History:

Comments

  1. November 11, 2017Evil4Zerggin said...

    I've heard conflicting accounts regarding actually superfiring superfiring turrets, i.e. firing directly forward or aft. Some say it was safe to do, while others say that firing directly over the bow or stern would risk damage to the softer elements of the ship. To what extent was it actually done?

    If it was discouraged in practice, were there other reasons for having a superfiring arrangement, given that I imagine superfiring turrets made for a more top-heavy ship? Lessening the length of the armored citadel? Improving the field of fire even if it didn't go all the way forwards/aft in practice? At least providing the option to fire directly forwards/aft in extremis?

  2. November 11, 2017bean said...

    The ability to fire directly over the other turret depends heavily on some details of turret design. The British had trouble within about 30 deg before Hood. The US didn't. It was normal to fire on the broadside, and firing dead ahead was somewhat rare. You're pretty much right on the advantages. Smaller citadel (turrets at the same level need room to turn past each other), better broadside firepower, more efficient use of weight. I'm going to talk about this a lot more quite soon, so I think I'll cut this off here.

Comments from SlateStarCodex:

Leave a comment

All comments are reviewed before being displayed.


Name (required):


E-mail (required, will not be published):

Website:

You can use Markdown in comments!


Enter value: Captcha